Three days later, on December 6, 1982, the United States, represented by William A. Keefer, an attorney from the Department of Justice,4 signed detailed plea agreements with each of the four appellants. Therefore, the fourth, fifth, seventh and eighth special defenses fail to preclude summary judgment. Donofrio Dahill Profiles in Bridgeport CT, Fairfield CT, and Stratf Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. 251, 253 (S.D.W. This was among the amendments to the Rules of Criminal Procedure transmitted by the Chief Justice to Congress pursuant to 18 U.S.C. WebAbbott, Jackie IFS Stratford 203-455-3134 Jessica.Kremer@ct.gov Acosta-Lopez, Angel SD Waterbury 203-805-7466 mallory.valdez@ct.gov Albertie, Mary IFS Danbury 203-448-3506 Shannon.Cooke@ct.gov Renee D'onofrio Kremmer, Jessica Mark LaMadeleine McCarthy Dori 13 (picked up SD CM) Salvo, Roseann 11 Santilli, Margherita 9 Abbie Unlike the frequent case where the maximum punishment under the general conspiracy section, 18 U.S.C. Saltzburg, Pleas of Guilty and the Loss of Constitutional Rights: The Current Price of Pleading Guilty, 76 Mich. L. Rev. This article about a West Virginia politician is a stub. It seems that JavaScript is not working in your browser. It has jurisdiction of all matters expressly committed to it and of all other matters cognizable by any law court of which the exclusive jurisdiction is not given to some other court. The second Hopkins affidavit assert[s] that the affiant [is] employed by the servicing agent for the substitute plaintiff, a relationship strong enough to establish a foundation for the affiant's claims that she [is] familiar with the books and records regarding the defendant's indebtedness. Bank of America, FSB v. Franco, 57 Conn.App. Cloudflare Ray ID: 7c0c67540c8d0a9f 894 against void-for-vagueness attack). 134, 137, 948 A.2d 1035 (2008). By virtue of a quit claim deed dated and recorded on November 17, 2006, Donofrio transferred an interest in the subject property to 4 Whip. 891 and 892(b) are constitutional. The proceedings were digitally recorded. Conf.Rep. The hearing convened at 2:22 PM, with Hearing Officer, Lisa F. Siegel presiding. Rather, the thrust of 4 Whip's objection concerns the subject matter jurisdiction of the court. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Webelizabeth baptist church pastor oliver. Bradshaw Smith v. James Redeker, Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Transportation; State of Connecticut Department of Transportation; Kevin Maloney, Chairman, State of Connecticut, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission; and State of Connecticut, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission. 2d 524 (1960). WebTop 3 Results for Dahill Donofrio in CT 1 The best result we found for your search is Dahill A Donofrio age 60s in Shelton, CT in the Shelton neighborhood. YvXP+U$Y$iqAn2e^M?iB,'_:8*5]C0uQn7msIa1m Hand crafted, one of a kind, all leather handbags and all leather goods. By virtue of a quit claim deed dated and recorded on November 17, 2006, Donofrio transferred an interest in the subject property to 4 Whip. ], Whether the publicity, the charge to the Grand Jury and other conduct of the Government described in the record below require the dismissal of the indictment. 189, 194, 916 A.2d 130 (2006), citing Bank of America, FSB v. Hanlon, 65 Conn.App. See also Lefkowitz v. Newsome, 420 U.S. 283, 95 S. Ct. 886, 43 L. Ed. D'ONOFRIO Donofrio, 4 Whip and the defendant Connecticut Environmental, LLC, have all appeared in this matter and were properly served with process. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. Attorney Michael S. Casey appeared on behalf of the respondents. Share. Westen, Away from Waiver: A Rationale for the Forfeiture of Constitutional Rights in Criminal Procedure, 75 Mich. L. Rev. The second Hopkins affidavit assert[s] that the affiant [is] employed by the servicing agent for the substitute plaintiff, a relationship strong enough to establish a foundation for the affiant's claims that she [is] familiar with the books and records regarding the defendant's indebtedness. Bank of America, FSB v. Franco, 57 Conn.App. 2d 205 (1976); United States v. Corr, 543 F.2d 1042, 1050 (2 Cir. 892(a) is void for vagueness; (2) that 892(b), along with the definition of an extortionate extension of credit in 891(6), creates an unconstitutional statutory presumption;3 and (3) that prejudicial pretrial publicity required dismissal. 570, 576-77, 989 A.2d 606, cert. The substitute plaintiff, the Bank of New York, as Trustee for TBW Mortgage-Backed Trust 2007-1 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-1 (the Bank), now moves for summary judgment as to liability against the defendant 4 Whip, LLC (4 Whip). Garcia was the next to plead. No votes were taken. D'Onofrio Leather Designs 442 U.S. at 157, 99 S. Ct. at 2224 (emphasis supplied). Kakadelis v. DeFabritis, 191 Conn. 276, 282, 464 A.2d 57 (1983). They and their codefendants Roberto Garcia and Dahill D'Onofrio now appeal pursuant to conditional pleas of guilty under plea agreements made with the prosecutor and approved by Chief Judge T.F. q&.ao@*\u\kpwcOvn!s?P]q QZ$#:1\!3(c =X"uoOVnq>v\,2v)8u-2ygy5-'g*N4l]ZEiFIb&JF-aO>-dz=|Mf3?$Y%H!^omT |Zlz-['bs[YAR"_v>wKTMTJT whu Q$/@$;&A}nYiu! cg ESG*Kn@:a.@.QK%m=8G#n.F+%#HC$I.!N()R`H'VNmT?H1xiZ20vS)P}A#Pfoy*Ynl'8M; M 688, 695, 751 A.2d 394 (2000). Counsel for appellants objects to our considering these, saying that his statement "reflected only a concession that the Government would attempt to offer such evidence--not an admission that the Government's version of the facts was accurate; that all of the proffered testimony would be relevant or admissible; or that appellants had in fact made the statements that the Government indicated that potential trial witnesses would attribute to them." Case Summary. ") The indictment, returned on January 13, 1982, contained seven counts. Francis Curcio's plea agreement recited that he would enter a guilty plea to Count Three of the indictment pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S. Ct. 160, 27 L. Ed. 1982), over the expansion of the conditional guilty plea from its historic use in preserving contentions collateral to the general issue, such as claims of constitutionally invalid searches, seizures and confessions or of bar by the statute of limitations to guilty pleas that are "subject to a large number and variety of conditions", 684 F.2d at 1071, or "that reserve an extensive number of issues for appeal." 975 Sereno Drive. Furthermore, the Bank has established that it satisfied the preconditions of the mortgage and note, that Donofrio, the defaulting mortgagor, was noticed of his default, that Donofrio and 4 Whip were both served with process, and that the Bank is the present holder of the note and mortgage. 208.97.157.214 We are thus being asked to pass on a contention raising constitutional questions, governed by a Supreme Court decision that has been puzzling to commentators12 and to courts,13 which demand careful scrutiny of a trial record and instructions which do not exist. Donofrio issued a promissory note to Taylor on November 7, 2006. 4Whip has raised nine special defenses. Reconnect with Dahill Donofrio by joining our alumni site today. New Haven v. God's Corner Church, Inc., 108 Conn.App. WebDahill Donofrio 's birthday is 04/28/1954 and is 68 years old. In the absence of an evidentiary record we cannot say whether the prosecutor would have been able to invoke Pinkerton. Although appellants characterize 892(b) as a "presumption", it certainly is not a "mandatory presumption", namely, a rule that "tells the trier that he or they must find the elemental fact upon proof of the basic fact, at least unless the defendant has come forward with some evidence to rebut the presumed connection between the two facts." Moreover, the plea agreement, as we read it, would not be satisfied by our simply saying that we are bound by Pinkerton; rather we would be required to consider whether, as appellants argue in their brief, it should be overruled. Instead the Court held that " [a]s long as it is clear that the presumption is not the sole and sufficient basis for a finding of guilt", it need meet only a "more likely than not" rather than a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, and, after analyzing the precise facts and jury instructions in Allen, concluded that the New York statute passed the test as there applied. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. The latter would have testified that he was aware of the reputations of Francis Curcio and D'Onofrio for violence and believed he would suffer broken bones in the event of a default. WebView Dahill Donofrios profile on LinkedIn, the worlds largest professional community. 13 0 obj 2d 596 (1979): It is settled that, as a matter of due process, a criminal statute that "fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated conduct is forbidden by the statute," United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617 [74 S. Ct. 808, 811, 98 L. Ed. [J]udgment is not completed until damages have been assessed. Tureck v. George, 44 Conn.App. The mandate shall issue forthwith. and three grandchildren. 400 U.S. at 37, 91 S. Ct. at 167, Whether 18 U.S.C. Defendant had moved for dismissal of a count in an indictment charging this offense on the ground that compelling registration violated his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and pleaded guilty after his motion was denied. Specifically, 4 Whip alleges: (1) failure to comply with the provisions of the note and deed; (2) failure to comply with mandatory conditions precedent to the acceleration of the loan and commencement of suit; (3) failure to provide the requisite notice pursuant to the terms of the note and deed; (4) lack of standing; (5) lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (6) lack of personal jurisdiction; (7) lack of subject matter jurisdiction in that no properly constituted entity owns and holds the [n]ote and/or [m]ortgage in question; and/or that any purported assignment or transfer thereof is ineffective and unenforceable; (8) lack of subject matter jurisdiction in that there is presently no proper party [p]laintiff before the [c]ourt, or if so, said party is not the legal owner of the [n]ote and [m]ortgage; and (9) defectiveness, unenforceability and/or prematurity of the Bank's action as a result of the foregoing special defenses. 1975), cert. WebDahill's age is 68. 4 Whip asserts that, by extension, this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the matter. We therefore reject appellants' argument that 892(a) is void for vagueness "on its face". Ryders Health Management Location 7003 Main St, Stratford, Connecticut, 06614, United States Description Industry Greenwich Silver Shield Association v. Director, Human Resources Department, Town of Greenwich; Human Resources Department, Town of Greenwich; and Town of Greenwich, Robert Cushman v. Chief, Police Department, Town of Montville; and Police Department, Town of Montville, Dahill Donofrio v. Assessor, Town of Stratford; and Town of Stratford, Kareem Hedge v. Chief, Police Department, City of Bridgeport; and Police Department, City of Bridgeport, Edward Peruta v. Reuben Bradford, Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection; and State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Edward Peruta v. Reuben Bradford, Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Division of State Police; Paul Mounts, Supervisor, State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Division of State Police; and State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Division of State Police, Edward Peruta v. Reuben Bradford, Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Division of State Police; and State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Division of State Police, Paul Baer v. William Witkowski, Chairman, Board of Education, Thompson Public Schools; and Board of Education, Thompson Public Schools, Bradshaw Smith v. James Readeker, Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Transportation; State of Connecticut Department of Transportation; Kevin Maloney, Chairman, State of Connecticut, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission; and State of Connecticut, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission, Anne Stevenson v. Chief Public Defender, State of Connecticut, Office of the Public Defender, Division of Public Defender Services; and State of Connecticut, Office of the Public Defender, Division of Public Defender Services. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. Louis E D Onofrio Ellsworth would have testified that Cray had brought him to Gus Curcio and D'Onofrio for a loan, which was made at 4% interest per week (208% per year), and that he believed that Curcio and D'Onofrio would cause him physical harm if he failed to repay. Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Fequiere, 119 Conn.App. Linda D'Onofrio has been working as a Corporate Clinical Director at Ryders Health Management for 1 year. Nevertheless, the plaintiff has attached a properly authenticated affidavit to its reply memorandum, curing the alleged deficiencies in the original Hopkins affidavit.6. Family Medicine. We found 15 phone numbers and email addresses. "aQ\]_}Doendstream FN3. 1982), and the cases cited therein, any or all of the issues raised on appeal were improperly reserved under the conditional guilty plea." Your IP: WebDahill A Donofrio Jr Dahill A Donofrio Jr, Age 69 aka Donofrio Dahill, Dahill D Onofrio Current Address: LZDM Greystone, Shelton, CT Past Addresses: Bridgeport CT, Shelton They have also lived in Although our views as to the impropriety of what was attempted here in the face of the warnings given in United States v. Burns, supra, 684 F.2d 1066, and other cases we have cited, would incline us to the latter course, we do not deem this to be proper since either of the first two grounds, if sustained, would result in dismissal of the indictment and defendants should not have to undergo an unnecessary trial if they are entitled to prevail. The conclusion that a statute is too vague and therefore void as a matter of due process is thus unlikely to be triggered without two findings: that the individual challenging the statute is indeed one of the entrapped innocent, and that it would have been practical for the legislature to draft more precisely. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. 684 F.2d at 1073. 1978). Moreover, the Bank has established that it is the holder of the subject note and mortgage through its evidentiary submissions. Appellants' proposal that we determine the validity of 892(b) apart from an evidentiary record and jury instructions invites the very "on its face" consideration of constitutionality which the Allen majority condemned. (footnotes omitted). Angelo is a resident of 487 Commanche Lanes, Stratford, CT 06614. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. NOTICE: The special meeting scheduled in the following matter for March 7, 2014 at 9:30 AM, was postponed. Indeed, as pointed out in 1 Weinstein & Berger, Evidence under the United States Rules, p 303, at 303-25 (1982), the novelty of Allen, and the point on which the majority of five and the minority of four divided, was its holding that in determining whether a "permissive presumption" satisfied the rationality test "the proper evidence to scrutinize is not the general experience of the community or the validity of the legislative findings which support the presumption, but rather the evidence submitted in the particular case at issue." WebGet Notified when Dahill A Donofrio's info changes Unlock Background Report View Cell Phone Number The landline phone number 2033789125 is registered to Dahill A Andrew B. The email address cannot be subscribed. 1982). m(%RS+Tu-e8LPuW-s?psgkT&ouHe^fkgGE;Z31Sr]-1* See also United States v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers, 352 U.S. 567, 590-92, 77 S. Ct. 529, 540-41, 1 L. Ed. 1311 (1956) (id.). WebAngelo is on the list of graduates from high school. 2d 110] (1972), is void for vagueness. Dahill - Home - Facebook Attached to the Bank's reply are authenticated copies of the exhibits referred to in the second Hopkins affidavit. Twitter is an internet service where users can update the world in real-time as to their current activities, thoughts and location in 140 characters or less. Each meeting will be held in the Freedom of Information Hearing Room, First Floor, 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut, for the purpose of conducting a hearing concerning the contested case designated by the corresponding docket number listed below. Web3 FREE public records found for Dahill Donofrio in Stratford, CT. FastPeopleSearch results include contact information such as addresses, phone numbers, and email A valuable commentary distills the following as the guiding principle of these decisions:10 [A] defendant who has been convicted on a plea of guilty may challenge his conviction on any constitutional ground that, if asserted before trial, would forever preclude the state from obtaining a valid conviction against him, regardless of how much the state might endeavor to correct the defect. Onofrio (emphasis in original). Alternatively, the Bank attacks each special defense on an individual basis, arguing that 4 Whip's special defenses fail to preclude summary judgment. As of September 5, 2022, Freedom of Information Commission meetings and contested case hearings will resume being conducted in person. ], Whether the Pinkerton doctrine, set forth in Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S. Ct. 1180, 90 L. Ed. 134, 137, 948 A.2d 1035 (2008). The same would seem to be true with respect to appellants' claim of prejudicial publicity if this is read to be, as again we think it must, that the effect of the publicity had been such that nothing short of dismissal of the indictment would do. 93, 787 A.2d 32 (2001). The court has already addressed the issues of standing and subject matter jurisdiction and need not revisit its prior analysis. 577, 581, 783 A.2d 88 (2001). Seven persons linked to this address. 4 Whip offers no specific factual assertions or evidence in support of its first three defenses. It has jurisdiction of all matters expressly committed to it and of all other matters cognizable by any law court of which the exclusive jurisdiction is not given to some other court. 4205(b) (2) with the understanding that such recommendation would not bind the court; that the parties approved the right of the defendant to seek review of the issues summarized in an attached Exhibit A;6 and that: The parties approve the right of defendant to seek timely review in accordance with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, of the issues summarized in the document attached as Exhibit A, as those issues are more fully set forth in defendant's pretrial motion papers, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. FN1. NOTICE: The special meeting scheduled in the following matter for March 6, 2014 at 9:30 AM, was postponed.